Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Colorado Baker Who Refused Cake for Gay Couple

 In Politics, religion

The Supreme Court on Monday “set aside” a Colorado ruling against Colorado Baker Jack Phillips in a ruling that was narrow in its scope by a vote of 7-2. The point of contention was about a comment made by a Colorado Civil Rights Commission member that appeared to be biased against the Christian religion of the baker. In other words, the court found that religious hostility on the part of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission appeared to play a part in their sanctions against Masterpiece Bake Shop.

The court felt that the government should be neutral towards religious beliefs.

“The reason and motive for the baker’s refusal were based on his sincere religious beliefs and convictions. The Court’s precedents make clear that the baker, in his capacity as the owner of a business serving the public, might have his right to the free exercise of religion limited by generally applicable laws. Still, the delicate question of when the free exercise of his religion must yield to an otherwise valid exercise of state power needed to be determined in an adjudication in which religious hostility on the part of the State itself would not be a factor in the balance the State sought to reach.” Justice Kennedy

The court did NOT take up the wider issue about whether or not a bake shop could refuse to make a cake for a gay couple, but left that for an adjudication that removed the “hostility” so that a decision could be unbiased. In other words, if the state is hateful towards religion in its decision making, it’s making a mistake.

Baker Jack Phillips had lost every court battle up until the Supreme Court. This time, two liberal justices joined in the majority ruling because they saw a bias against the baker’s faith.

You can read the full decision here:

Supreme Court Masterpiece Cake Shop Opinion by Fox News on Scribd

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search

double jeopardy