Russian Military Movement: What U.S. Mainstream Media Will Not Say
Within the last few weeks, Russia has made several strategic military moves around Syria with a ‘just in case’ approach. Although Russia is still desperately attempting to make peace agreements with the U.S., the U.S.’ continuing procrastination has given Russia what they believe is no choice in the matter.
According to Covert Geopolitics, in one of Russia’s attempt to maintain peace, it has been a little over 2 weeks since Russia declared a unilateral cease fire in order to put a stop to the United Nations and Western media’s claims of “relentless” bombings in Aleppo supposedly causing “human catastrophe.” However, within that time, there have still been several chemical attacks from U.S. backed rebels, resulting in hundreds of civilian deaths.
An excerpt from Covert Geopolitics reads;
Since then, the so called “moderate rebels” have launched multiple chemical attacks in Aleppo and Mosul, resulting to hundreds of civilian deaths which both the UN and the western media are so silent about.
This is the White House deceptively invoking its Plan B for Syria.
In another attempt to pacify the US, it’s claiming that there are rebels with legitimate reasons to confront the Syrian government. Russia has asked for a separation of the U.S. backed rebels from among those fighting alongside Al-Qaeda. US procrastination has caused major concern, primarily because there isn’t much of a difference between the two factions.
In response to the US’s lack of urgency and the possible threat of their moving forward with “Plan B”, the Russian military has made tactical moves around Syria. Including but not limited to;
- Russian S-300 air defense missile launchers to defend the Russian naval base and warships in Syria.
- S-400 air defense missile system to Khmeimim in Syria.
- 2 Russian ships taking cruise missiles to the Mediterranean.
- A Russian aircraft carrier joining the Russian Naval Fleet in the eastern Mediterranean.
It has been stated that Vladimir Putin may be waiting until after the American presidential elections to see what comes next on the Russian military agenda, hoping that there will be a new administration to deal with.
With the threat of World War III on the brink of rising one has to wonder why the US maintains its position in the support of Syrian rebels if it is perpetually causing conflict between itself and another nuclear power?
This interview with WikiLeaks Julian Assange says it all;
“… the US government has agreed, that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS and funding ISIS, but the dodge has always been that it is some “rogue” princes using their oil money to do whatever they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that it is the government of Saudi Arabia, and the government of Qatar that have been funding ISIS.”
John Pilger: The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the first two, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is secretary of state, and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly Saudi Arabia.
Julian Assange: Under Hillary Clinton – and the Clinton emails reveal a significant discussion of it – the biggest-ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia: more than $80 billion. During her tenure, the total arms exports from the US doubled in dollar value.
JP: Of course, the consequence of that is that this notorious jihadist group, called ISIL or ISIS, is created largely with money from people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation?
US will never separate its fighters from ‘Islamists’ because it depends on them