Russia did it? What’s the real agenda of the left’s claim?

 In opinion, Politics

As we laugh at the constant claims of the Democrats that Russia swayed the election, there are some very real dangers here that we need to watch.

Democrats want to delete your vote

First, John Podesta, Clinton campaign chairman,(you know, the man in the middle of the Wikileaks scandals- plural) has called for the electoral college to be briefed on the Russian involvement in the election.

Why, you ask? Because they want to sway the outcome and delete YOUR votes. The left will not stand for our votes to be accepted…and they are doing everything in their power to destroy it days before the electoral college meets on December 19.

Insider leaks versus outside hackers

The problem with that is the CIA “assessment” may not be correct. One British parliament member says it was an “insider leak” not an outside hack and says he has met the man who leaked it. His close connection to Julian Assange of Wikileaks makes it a reasonable statement.

“A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they ‘know the individuals’ involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of “We know who it was, it was the Russians” are beneath contempt.

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.” Craig Murray

It’s frustrating when you know something important and no one pays the least bit of attention to you.

No Consensus in Intelligence

An article in Fox News today reveals once again the rift between the CIA and other federal agencies over the motive for Russia if indeed they hacked into the Democrats. The CIA based their entire case on the fact that only Democrat information was released.

In a letter to James Clapper, Rep. Devin Nunes wanted some reasons why all of a sudden the CIA went from having no evidence to a positive stance on Russian hacking to boost Donald Trump. The motive is still up in the air.

Fox News reported on the letter:

On November 17, 2016, you told the Committee during an open hearing that the IC (Intelligence Community) lacked strong evidence connecting Russian government cyberattacks and WikiLeaks disclosures,” Nunes wrote.

In response to a question at the time from ranking Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, Clapper had said, “As far as the WikiLeaks connection, the evidence there is not as strong and we don’t have good insight into the sequencing of the releases or when the data may have been provided. We don’t have as good insight into that.”

What’s the agenda?

Here’s the problem, America. The Democrats want your vote not to count in any way. They want Trump gone. They are worse than sore losers, they are actively attempting to destroy our Republic by deleting the election results.

Obama called for an investigation, with just weeks left of his term. But even then, he emphatically stated that there was NO EVIDENCE of any vote tampering during the Presidential election.


No vote tampering. But the left is desperate, so pay attention, America. The next week is critical to the actual outcome of the election.

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search

trump's cabinet