LIARS- Investigation found NO Link Between Trump and Russia, but…

 In opinion, Politics

As the Democrats continue to claim that the Russians are “interfering” with the election with everything from Wikileaks to Donald Trump and anyone else who stands in their way, we learn that the investigation has found NO links to Russia. That would be anywhere. They can’t even show that Russia leaked the original DNC emails. But…Hillary has numerous spurious connections.

The Clinton campaign attempts to claim ALL opposition as tools of the Russian government. They did it to Bernie, they’re currently doing it to Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, and of course the now infamous attempt to vilify Trump as a Putin tool for months on end.

The New York Times reported,

“Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.”

So there is still that belief that somewhere it must be the Russians that did all this nefarious activity…but they can’t prove it.

The Intercept reported,

“A frequent weapon for Democrats in the 2016 election is to publicly malign those they regard as critics and adversaries as Russia sympathizers, Putin stooges, or outright agents of the Kremlin. To put it mildly, this is not a new tactic in U.S. political discourse, and it’s worth placing it in historical context. That’s particularly true given how many people have now been targeted with this attack…

So that’s the Democratic Party’s approach to the 2016 election. Those who question, criticize or are perceived to impede Hillary Clinton’s smooth, entitled path to the White House are vilified as stooges, sympathizers and/or agents of Russia: Trump, WikiLeaks, Sanders, The Intercept, Jill Stein. Other than loyal Clinton supporters, is there anyone left who is not covertly controlled by or in service to The Ruskies?



All of the above tweets are based on lies.

The Democrats attempt to smear the opposition by drawing a correlation to Russia. The Media has used it, and in fact has promoted it as gospel.

But who really has questionable ties to Russia? John Podesta and Hillary/Bill Clinton.

According to a 2015 NYT article, money “flowed” into the Clintons after the Uranium One deal. That one deal alone gave Russia control over 1/5 of America’s Uranium capacity. She didn’t reveal that those responsible for that deal gave money to her foundation, even though she signed a disclosure agreement with the government. She approved the arrangement. Slick Willy got $500,000 from a Russian Investment bank for a speech in Moscow… that bank had ties to the Uranium One deal.

And they have the sand to say that their opposition is in the pockets of the Kremlin?

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search

peter kadzik