Ghost Guns – Sen. Schumer Has A Plan

 In 2nd Amendment

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) wants gun parts  (i.e. uppers and lowers) to be regulated as whole guns. Because he claims ghost guns (a media term) are a “growing problem” for law enforcement because the parts “can’t be traced.”

Ghost guns 

Schumer wants the Department of Justice to change the definition of the 1968 Gun Control Act to include all parts of a weapon so that it would make them harder to sell.  He says that would keep “ghost guns” out of the hands of criminals. (Bearing Arms)

Seriously. So lawful gun owners switching out a part that doesn’t work in their weapon just doesn’t sit well with them.


A former ATF agent of 23 years and firearms expert, Dan O’Kelly, has been testifying that they have “misinterpreted” a component of the 1968 Act.

KSL News Radio reported  [Disclaimer: note that some of the links in the KSL story are from CNN and Gifford Law, an anti-gun organization):

As O’Kelly sees it, the ATF has been deliberately misinterpreting a key gun control regulation for decades because officials fear that following the letter of the law would allow criminals to build AR-15s and other firearms piece by piece with unregulated parts.

He said he voiced his concerns to an ATF official two decades ago, but was rebuffed.

Now, however, his view is gaining traction in courtrooms around the country.

In December, a federal judge in Ohio dismissed weapons-related charges against two men after O’Kelly testified that the AR-15 part at issue in their case was not subject to federal law or regulation.

US District Court Judge James G. Carr for the Northern District of Ohio called the ATF’s long-standing interpretation of the regulation “unreasonable and legally unacceptable.”

If you recall, in 2014, Ares Armor in Southern California was raided by the ATF and thousands of gun parts were seized. After much wrangling, the Bureau returned 5,786 parts, but not until serious financial drain on the business occurred.

O’Kelly testified on behalf of Ares Armor, stating that the ATF showed “a lack of logic and consistency, which has created a climate in the firearm industry wherein it is nearly impossible for the reasonable man to be able to operate in good faith within the law.”

Changes coming?

The 1938 Federal Firearms Act (originally passed in 1934) regulated every part of a gun.  But the 1968 Gun Control Act picked a single part of a gun for serial number regulation. (Ammoland timeline).

“That part of a firearm which provides housing for the hammer, bolt or breechblock, and firing mechanism, and which is usually threaded at its forward portion to receive the barrel.”  1993 amendment

O’Kelly states that for 50 years, the ATF has been attempting to make a “square peg fit in a round hole” with their definitions. He states that roughly 60% of the firearms now do not have a part that fits the definition – because ARs have a “split receiver.”

Although some have stated that taking O’Kelly’s view wipes out 50 years of ATF regulations and allows rampant ‘ghost guns’ into the hands of criminals, it appears that the ATF is reviewing the cases to see if changes can be made.

Senator Schumer has obviously been reading up on these cases in his penchant to remove the so-called ghost guns from the marketplace. He wants all parts of a gun to be included in the Federal statute.


Sign up for our Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children newsletter and check out our shop while you’re there!


  • Dan

    I would be very interested to know exactly what source of information Schumer gets his alleged information from? I’d be willing to bet vital parts of his anatomy that there has not been one official law enforcement report (U10-100, etc.) that includes the words, “Ghost Gun” anywhere in these 50 United States…EVER! As far as the BATFE’s tactics of abuse go, this has been going on for a looooong time. A very good friend of mine had had a FFL license for over 30 years, but recently was harassed into giving it up when a BATFE agent came to do the annual check. Always before, my friend got a clean bill of health on his records until this last time back in 2014. The agent claimed to have found several “violations” which would have added up to a considerable amount of money and gave him the choice of being charged with the “violations” or my friend could relinquish his FFL status. When my friend asked what changed from last year to this, he was told off the record that the word had come down to quietly eliminate all private FFL holders by “finding” violations. This is how gun control is being sneaked in through the back door. The liberals have had no success through legitimate means, so they use intimidation to get what they want.

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search

Virginia House of Delegatesmayors against illegal guns