Democrat Eric Swalwell: “The 2nd Amendment is Not an Absolute Right”

 In 2nd Amendment

Democrat Eric Swalwell has entered the 2020 race for President. The guy who was ‘famous’ for threatening to use nukes on regular citizens that didn’t agree with him is now saying that the 2nd Amendment is not an “absolute right”.

“You know, keep your pistols, keep your long rifles, keep your shotguns. I want the most dangerous weapons, these weapons of war, out of the hands of the most dangerous people. But when it comes to what else we can do, because I don’t even suggest this is all we can do, I also want background checks. So do 73% of NRA members…
“…The Second Amendment is not an absolute right. Just like free speech, you can’t shout fire in a theater or lie about the products you are selling. You can’t own a bazooka. You can’t own a tank. You can’t own rocket propelled grenades.” Rep Eric Swalwell


Is that anything like “If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor?” He seems to imply that those weapons are already in the hands of the “most dangerous people” because the law-abiding gun owners who own them are into the millions. Removing those weapons from the good guys makes them victims of the really dangerous bad guys who can get guns any time they choose.

Swalwell’s primary issues are the gun issues. He says he is running for President to “#Endgunviolence.” He also made some incorrect statements in his remarks.

Where did that 73% of NRA members want background checks come from? Background checks are a Federal law that has been in place for years and doesn’t do squat for stopping “gun violence.” Many of the mass shooters have actually passed those background checks. They don’t purchase their weapons from private parties, which is what that “expanded background check” thing is from. He believes the “American people” are all on board with his radical idea. Not.

As we reported previously, he wants to spend $15 Billion of your hard earned dollars to do a massive “gun buyback.” And he also wants to “ban military-style weapons of war.”

“Those guns belong on our battlefields, not in our schools.” Eric Swalwell

Deceptive slogan. We have reported many times on the idiocy of Democrats who think an AR platform rifle is an “assault rifle.” They think it’s a “weapon of war.” In truth, “weapons of war” – fully automatic firearms – are already banned from civilian ownership. Swalwell seems to be deaf on that point, as are most other Democrats and liberals. It’s because their agenda is disarmament, in spite of Swalwell’s statement that he “likes to shoot.”

Another point that he continues to make is that he believes the buyback program is for 15 million guns. The estimates are that there may be around 300 million guns in America. Is he only buying back ARs? Because the Virginia Tech shooter used handguns to kill 32 people. How does any of that actually stop “gun violence?”

He also wants to go after the resisters, the ones who won’t give their guns up willingly (that’s into the millions as well, by the way). And there appears to be a growing trend of law enforcement officers who will refuse to go door to door to confiscate the weapons of ordinary citizens.

Why? Because it’s not only suicide, it’s their oath to the Constitution. And the Constitution specifically says that the Second Amendment is an inalienable RIGHT.

Showing 13 comments
  • Paul moore

    Go fuck yourself you pos soicalist prick you better start reading our consatuion it plainly tells you that we have a right to own a gun .where do democrats get off that we don’t have gun right your the risen why we have gun to keep you soicalist prick out of power .

    • James Hill

      According to the Dick Act of 1902 states that the 2nd Amendment cannot be repealed and further states that gun control is forbidden it is protecting against Tyrannical Government. It also invalidates all gun laws in the United States. Swallwell is an idiot and knows nothing and just wants to get elected to office he has no life experiences. The. Dick Act of 1902 also cannot be repealed it will violate the constitution .

      • Joseph F Yates


  • Al Ott

    You go girl. The truth will set them free!

  • Ron

    So eric please tell me how you interpret “shall not be infringed” within the 2nd amendment ??

  • Robert Walo

    Remember shall not be infringed? All gun control laws are unconstitutional.

  • Johnhob

    He’s a fkn communist puke, they can’t control a armed population they are scared and they should be , we better rise up against Democrat TYRANNY

  • John OSCAR Hein

    Rumors rogue dirty dem FBI agents were at Mandalay Bay Oct1 Vegas Massacre and this goofball said he was an outta state cop walking around with a Stethascope and gloves on with a big smile…second shooter? Deep State shot at Trump by rogue FBI? Who killed us in Vegas as Paddock a patsy and CSI leaked that kill pic cause spent shells on top of blood. That security guard do it?

  • Terry

    Gun ownership is NOT vouschafed by the Constitution; rather, it is granted by God, and ratified by the Constitution….comprende’, Pendejo?…… the Constitution DOES NOT GRANT RIGHTS!!! ALL RIGHTS ARE ENDOWED BY OUR CREATOR, AND MERELY ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE BIG C! ….okay, thats our civics lesson for the day.

  • Samuel

    The 2nd Amendment was written and passed to enable the citizens the resources to defend themselves against their own government if it became a threat to impose it’s will against the Constitution.

  • Justin

    Molan labe!

  • Alan Strauss

    Eric the 2nd Amendment does not grant the right at all. It forbids you or any other government official from infringing on my right to defend my stand my family. That is my right granted by my God. It is inalienable.

  • Danny

    These fuckin stupid overeducated pieces of shit don’t even know what the constitution says but they want to run for president just wastin your time and others time you gun grabbin commie fuck

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search

california gun owners