Coup Continues: Vindman Tried to Alter Call Transcript. Failed

 In Politics

Yesterday, Lt Col Alexander Vindman, a member of the National Security Council, testified in Adam Schiff’s kangaroo court in the basement of the Capitol Building…the coup continues. Several things became readily apparent: 1) NSC members are not supposed to wear their uniforms (the theatrical presence), and 2) Adam Schiff shut down ANY Republican questions, only allowing Democrats to question the witness, and 3) Vindman admitted attempting to alter the President’s transcript of the Ukraine call but was unsuccessful in two cases, 4) Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony. Gateway Pundit

Vindman claimed that there were at least two omissions in the White House transcript, so he set about to alter it to put the omissions back. But the left wing NYT said that even with the phrases gone, the understanding of the transcript wasn’t changed. But of course, the left is seizing on the transcript not being “exact” and shrieking that it was not a true transcript.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

Colonel Vindman, who appeared on Capitol Hill wearing his dark blue Army dress uniform and military medals, told House impeachment investigators that he tried to change the reconstructed transcript made by the White House staff to reflect the omissions. But while some of his edits appeared to have been successful, he said, those two corrections were not made…

The phrases do not fundamentally change lawmakers’ understanding of the call, which was first reported by the C.I.A. whistle-blower whose complaint set off the impeachment inquiry.”The New York Times

Vindman believes that if the Ukraine pursued the investigation of Hunter Biden, they would lose bipartisan support. So the coup continues again.

“I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC’s lead counsel.” Lt Lt Col Vindman

We have undue influence or crimes possibly committed by an American connected to a high government official that may have caused serious national security issues and he didn’t want the US or the Ukraine to investigate it. What are his connections to Biden and the Democrats?

We have the possibility that this Lt Col violated US code 18 USC 798 in sharing a classified call with others.

The coup continues

When Rep Jordan attempted to ask Vindman who he shared the information with, Adam Schiff shut down the question.

Vindman’s testimony causes serious problems for the President, even though it is fraught with the admission of  leaking, altering a document, etc. If arrogance was against the US Code, we could probably prosecute Vindman for that.

Featured photo: Lt Col Vindman screenshot via Gateway Pundit


Sign up for our Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children newsletter and check out our shop while you’re there!

Showing 8 comments
  • ktuncia

    It is interesting how the deep state uses the possibility of how other deep state players might react negatively to someone rooting out corruption as a way of suggesting those trying to root out deep state corruption are doing something wrong. His statement is basically that he had fears that someone investigating corruption would cause corrupt politicians not to support Ukraine the way they have been in the past. Maybe that’s because those deep state players won’t support aid to Ukraine that doesn’t include kickbacks in their direction. Perhaps he’s really saying that if the possibility of graft is removed the money will stop flowing and that possibility bothered him.

  • David Benrexi

    Clearly the attempted coup is orchestrated by those who mock and ridicule faith and belief in Scripture. They seek only to manipulate and control. They are wicked and lawless, and this is what America was asking for when our Supreme Court wrote new laws to exclude God, prayer, and the bible from our public school curriculum. Now America is filled with non-believers who are easily manipulated to say and do what the enemy wants them to, America is under a curse for sixty years now, and freedom and justice are little more than a memory.

    • Faye Higbee

      Absolutely, David. It’s very obvious to us – it’s not obvious to many others.

  • JC Souders

    My thought as a former USMC with a Top Secret clearance was that any devulging of classified material or un-authorized changing of classified material put you in an espionage postion. And who, in that chain of command could trust a person in a military uniform who is committing espionage for any reason.
    As far as I would be concerned the chain of command is straight up to the Secretary of Defense and then the President. No where in there is the House or Senate listed for military personnel.
    So now I am guessing that is being allowed to change by our Military commanders. Need new Commanders.

  • Richard Claessens

    Mr Trump needs to remove all the comanders placed by Obama … They have agendas that are not about defending the USA

  • Jim Gregori

    Vindman admitted attempting to share the President’s classified call to other operatives….. I would call that spying, don’t you think? Sharing classified information with others goes against the grain of national security. The uniform doesn’t make any person immune from any crime. My guess it was used to provide a cover for more underlying actions that are ILLEGAL and TREASONOUS. No excuse. It’s still a dog and pony show.

  • 1LTLos

    I have been counseled not to wear my dress blues during a hearing — I wondered what this guy was hiding and hiding behind wearing the uniform of The American Soldier. I prefer his facing execution by musketry in the uniform he has disgraced!!

  • pj

    An Anti American, A disgrace to the uniform and his Country !!!

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search