Anti-Gun Control Sticker Leads to Citation in Tennessee

 In 2nd Amendment

When it comes to freedom of speech, stickers matter. Nicholas Ennis displayed an anti-gun control sticker on his truck, and a Sumner County, Tennessee deputy gave him a ticket for it, calling it “potentially obscene.” Potentially? What in the world does that mean?

The sticker on his truck is common among gun rights advocates. The patterns are slightly different on all of them, but they’re all  similar.

We at Uncle Sam’s even have a t-shirt with a similar picture on it, as do many other t-shirt companies:

Nicholas Ennis is not happy. And his friends who have the same sticker on their trucks are also not happy. It seems the  Deputy has stirred up a hornet’s nest of pro-gun sentiment.

“I think my First Amendment rights have been violated because it’s not spelled out like he said on the ticket. That we should have the right to express our opinions, and the freedom of speech, and they’re trying to take it away, the constitutional right, they’re trying to take all that away from us, like American ain’t free no more.” Nicholas Ennis (ABC 3340)

Ennis’ friend Sam Monaghan has the same sticker on his truck, but has never been cited for it. Ennis’ sticker has been on his truck for a year with no problems. Was he singled out? Possibly, but he’s fighting back.

EUGENE VOLOKH is the Gary T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law at UCLA. He explained why the citation given to Ennis was wrong:

“But of course this is constitutionally protected, given the Court’s decision in Cohen v. California (1971) that a jacket bearing the words “Fuck the Draft” was constitutionally protected. Indeed, it’s not even barred by the relevant Tennessee statute (Tenn. Code § 55-8-187),…

…The [statute] will not reach bumper stickers that are in extremely poor taste but are not obscene [under the Supreme Court’s obscenity precedents]. For example, bumper stickers such as “s..t happens,” although unquestionably in poor taste, do not meet the constitutional or statutory standards for obscenity because they do not appeal to the purient interest. Consequently, they cannot be banned as obscene.”

Nicholas Ennis is meeting with a lawyer this week. We hope that he will win his case against the citation in court. The fine is only $50, so he could just pay it and forget it. But to Mr. Ennis, there’s a principle involved. And he’s right!

Featured photo: screenshot via wkrn

*****

Sign up for our Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children newsletter and check out our shop while you’re there!

Showing 5 comments
  • Tim Duffy
    Reply

    I too am an American patriot and spent 30yrs in law enforcement. Although I would never cite someone for this it is somewhat crude.

  • Suzie Kekauoha
    Reply

    Wait, so you can burn the American flag, (which I find HIGHLY offensive), and that’s ok, but put an acronym on your truck and suddenly YOU’RE the bad guy?? That deputy was wrong and that ticket should be dismissed.

    • Brian Tunnelle
      Reply

      I see plenty of stickers on cars that say “Fu€k Cancer”. I doubt they are ever cited.

  • James Jinright
    Reply

    Freedom of speech dammit!

  • Taylor
    Reply

    Well, I know I’ve been pulled over for potentially speeding and potentially violating carpool laws and potentially running red lights.

    Oh wait, no I haven’t. You can’t cite based on “potential”.

    Also, this is no more or less offensive than the “Fuck Cancer” stickers and shirts that I’ve seen. How many of those people have been cited?

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search

knoxvilleflawed research